Trending Content: 40+ Best Apps April 2012 Android Outlook SyncBest Android Tablet Apps Best Android Apps Android App Store YouTube Downloader
The title is not a quote or any implied quote from Apple, Inc. and does not reflect the opinion of Apple, Inc. It is solely the sarcastic interpretation of AndroidTapp.com.
Now that the legal jazz is out of the way (because Apple may sue us for the title), we’ll delve into the context at hand. Apple announced that they will be suing HTC for infringement on 20 of their patents! HTC is the thriving mobile handset manufacturer behind many of Google’s Android powered phones including the Nexus One and Microsoft’s Windows Mobile and now Windows Phone 7 software.
Some of the patents are very broad and their asking for maximum monetary damages plus barring HTC from importing alleged phone to the U.S. This comes on the heels of Apple already counter-suing Nokia for very similar, Palm is in radar but since they have not made a big enough splash in the mobile OS pond yet… they have not been served with papers.
Here’s the patent allegations in summary and the full legal document via Gizmodo:
- The ’331 Patent, entitled “Time-Based, Non-Constant Translation Of User Interface Objects Between States,” was duly and legally issued on April 22, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
- The ’949 Patent, entitled “Touch Screen Device, Method, And Graphical User Interface For Determining Commands By Applying Heuristics,” was duly and legally issued on January 20, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’949 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
- The ’849 Patent, entitled “Unlocking A Device By Performing Gestures On An Unlock Image,” was duly and legally issued on February 2, 2010 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’849 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
- The ’381 Patent, entitled “List Scrolling And Document Translation, Scaling, And Rotation On A Touch-Screen Display,” was duly and legally issued on December 23, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’381 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.
- The ’726 Patent, entitled “System And Method For Managing Power Conditions Within A Digital Camera Device,” was duly and legally issued on July 6, 1999 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’726 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.
- The ’076 Patent, entitled “Automated Response To And Sensing Of User Activity In Portable Devices,” was duly and legally issued on December 15, 2009 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’076 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit F.
- The ’105 Patent, entitled “GMSK Signal Processors For Improved Communications Capacity And Quality,” was duly and legally issued on December 8, 1998 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’105 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit G.
- The ’453 Patent, entitled “Conserving Power By Reducing Voltage Supplied To An Instruction-Processing Portion Of A Processor,” was duly and legally issued on June 3, 2008 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’453 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit H.
- The ’599 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Graphic System,” was duly and legally issued on October 3, 1995 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’599 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit I.
- The ’354 Patent, entitled “Object-Oriented Event Notification System With Listener Registration Of Both Interests And Methods,” was duly and legally issued on July 23, 2002 by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the ’354 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit J.
I personally see this as a corporate ploy to eradicate competition and keep smartphone superiority as other companies elbow into their space. If Apple has their way it would have negative effects ultimately on consumers, limits choice and innovation in the market.
Would this stick or not? Would this defeat, slow down or do nothing to Google’s Android or Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7? Would this eliminate HTC right when they’re just getting started? What are your thoughts?
Updating...
20 Android Apps for AT&T’s Motorola Backflip
20 of the best Backflip Apps... Now that AT&T has joined the Android revolution, the first question new Android users ...
Just the fact that they haven’t sued Palm proves that this is about limiting competition, not protecting their patents despite what their press release says.
Wow, scrolling lists. How on earth were they awarded that patent? Honestly, are patent officers just monkeys at this point? Do they even know how to read?
Welcome to the world of software patents.
Only ‘726 are ‘453 is a hardware patents, as it seems.
There have been sooo many issues with the Patent Office, especially regarding software ‘innovations’. Remember the ‘one-click buy’ patent by Amazon…?
My opinion:
I hope Apple will not win their lawsuit.
In the end, the only ones getting richer out of this issue are the patent lawyers.
It should be all or nothing, they need to be prepared to sue, htc, motorola, palm, samsung, or nobody at all.
Oh god,
Apple! I just can say face-palm!!!
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w42/barrow_co2/Facepalm.jpg
Aren’t monopolies also illegal? Just sayin.
Most of the claims are simply shamless.
Apple seems to have a problem with competition, that’s all.
Interesting…
From the mouth of Steve:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW0DUg63lqU
“We’ve always been shameless about stealing great ideas”
WOW that’s classic. I remember watching a TV special about Apple and the mentioned the Picasso quote. Jobs seems to want to steal… lets call it inspiration, yet he does not want others to do the same. Shame!
Anyone else hearing a 4 year old boy shouting ‘MINE! MINE! MINE!’
“Object-Oriented Event Notification System With Listener Registration Of Both Interests And Methods” – seems to me that pattern (Observer) was published in the GOF book (in 1994).
Seems to me a lot of these “Patents” were already in the public domain.
Seems to me someone is getting worried.
Seems to me that they should be.
I bet they do not sue Palm, because I also bet that Palm has filed a LOT of patents LONG before apple did as Palm has a much longer experience with Touch screen hand held devices (and therefore most likely a lot of patents as well) compared to Apple.
??
I mean when did the first Palm Pilot came out from Palm? 1995?
Apple probably has to watch out not to step on Palm’s toes (Especially since they are now owned by HP who got the money to sue if necessary) and who wants to stir up a shit fight