Angry Birds Versus Alchemy, Which Android Game is More Addictive [Poll]

by Antonio Wells Oct 29, 2010 10:19 AM – 5 Comments

We’ve watched two of the most addictive games on Android heat up the download charts, Google search, and blogosphere! Those games being Angry Birds, which breezed passed 2 million downloads in a few days when released out of Beta, and Alchemy, which has millions of downloads and ponders players minds for hours in a week. We want to put the two together in an App Face-Off™ to see who is more addictive and why. My personal choice is Alchemy, what is yours? Let’s chat about your choice in the comments below and vote your choice in the poll below:

[poll id="2"]

Tags: Addictive Android Games, Alchemy, Alchemy Premium, Android App Face-Off, Android Apps, Angry Birds, App Face-Off, Best Android Games

Categorised in: Apps Blog, Featured, News

5 Comments

By Quentyn K. on October 29, 2010 at 2:29 pm:

Voted Angry Birds. I liked Alchemy but it just didn’t hold my attention very long.

Reply
By VW on October 29, 2010 at 4:28 pm:

I actually found alchemy rather boring, but perhaps that because I was bad at it

Reply
- By Osborne195 on October 29, 2010 at 11:21 pm:
  
  I agree, it’s one of those things like Twitter or Farmville…I just don’t get the appeal. Other seem to love it. The preview for Alchemy 2 looks cool since it actually had more visual looking stuff from what I’ve seen. Much better than dropping boxes of text on each other!
  
  Angry birds on the other hand is app crack.
  
  Reply
  - By Osborne195 on October 29, 2010 at 11:22 pm:
    
    NOTE: Apparently Alchemy 1 has been updated since the last time I tried it…now there’s little icons which makes it look a little more interesting. Maybe I’ll give it another try.
    
    Reply
By Joe on February 10, 2011 at 7:17 pm:

has anyone made it all the way through the “golden eggs” on angry birds? it’s like level 11.1 or something ridiculous like that. i completed it last night, which i’m now wondering…does that make me an app crack addict??

Reply